Suara Pakatan Rakyat Sabah

Suara Pakatan Rakyat Sabah

Rabu, 10 Februari 2016

Skandal NFC: Dana NFC Digunakan Beli Mercedes Mewah, Tanah Di Putrajaya, Membiayai Percutian Mewah Dan Dipindahkan Ke Singapura

Skandal NFC: Dana NFC Digunakan Beli Mercedes Mewah, Tanah Di Putrajaya, Membiayai Percutian Mewah Dan Dipindahkan Ke Singapura

Memandangkan Ketua Wanita Umno langsung tidak menunjukkan tanda-tanda beliau insaf setelah KEADILAN membuat pelbagai pendedahan mengenai penyelewengan dana NFC, saya terpanggil untuk terus menyenaraikan perbelanjaan-perbelanjaan boros bersifat peribadi yang dibuat keluarga beliau:

Pada 9 Disember 2009, keluarga Dato’ Seri Shahrizat Jalil menggunakan wang dari pinjaman mudah RM250 juta untuk membeli sebuah kereta mewah Mercedes Benz CLS 350 CGI berharga RM534,622.Dana sebanyak RM3,363,507 telah disalurkan melalui NMLC untuk membeli dua bidang tanah di Putrajaya iaitu PT1886 dan PT1887, Presint 10, Putrajaya. Kebarangkalian tanah-tanah ini dibeli untuk membuka ladang ternakan lembu di Putrajaya adalah tipis.Semakan bayaran-bayaran yang dibuat melalui cek dari akaun 141640000066107 CIMB Islamic Bank Berhad di bawah nama NFC menunjukkan bayaran yang besar dan berulang kali dibuat kepada Impian Global Network Services (IGNS). Siasatan KEADILAN menunjukkan IGNS adalah sebuah syarikat pelancongan yang menawarkan pakej percutian di Phuket, Kuching, Banding, Singapura dan Bali (sila lawati laman http://impianglobalnetworkservices.blogspot.com/ , petikan skrin laman tersebut disertakan di Lampiran 1).

Antara bulan Januari hingga Julai 2010, 15 cek berjumlah RM455,423 dikeluarkan kepada IGNS (butiran seperti di bawah). Ini menimbulkan tanda tanya bagaimanakah sebuah syarikat yang sepatutnya menguruskan ladang ternakan lembu menjadikan perbelanjaan pakej percutian sebagai perbelanjaan bulanan? Apakah ia telah disalahgunakan untuk membiayai percutian ahli keluarga menteri dan rakan-rakan mereka?

TARIKHNO CEKJUMLAH (RM)8 Jan 20100013761,52413 Jan 20100014061,70926 Jan 201000146528,47624 Feb 201000154012,74324 Feb 20100015433,0769 Mac 201000158722,4009 Mac 201000159026,5729 Mac 20100015925,77631 Mac 201000167145,42822 April 201000173527,85313 Mei 201000178945,23525 Mei 20100018253,19618 Jun 2010001848120,52116 Julai 201000192289,80016 Julai 201000192321,114JUMLAH455,423Pada 21 Julai 2010, NFC memindahkan sejumlah RM588,585 ke akaun milik Meatworks (Singapore) Pte Ltd milik keluarga menteri. Tindakan ini bertentangan dengan fungsi NFC tatkala Ketua Pemuda Umno mendakwa bahawa NFC tidak mempunyai sebarang urusniaga dengan Singapura kerana daging mentah Malaysia tidak boleh dieksport ke Singapura. Jika itu keadaannya, kenapa sejumlah besar wang dipindahkan ke Singapura?

Dato’ Seri Shahrizat Jalil hanya ada dua pilihan – sama ada menjelaskan satu persatu perbelanjaan-perbelanjaan ini di Perhimpunan Agong Umno dalam masa terdekat, atau terus mengheret Umno dan Barisan Nasional ke dalam kancah skandal peribadi beliau.

KEADILAN akan mengaturkan beberapa siri laporan polis serentak di seluruh negara untuk mendesak pihak berkuasa segera menyiasat penyelewengan dalam pendedahan terbaru ini.

MOHD RAFIZI RAMLI
PENGARAH STRATEGI KEADILAN

Sumber : Risalah Pakatan Rakyat

Tarkih 10 Februari Genap Satu Tahu DS Anwar Dipenjara, Bebaskan Anwar

Anwar sudah cakap lama dah – Farhan Zulkefly

Pada 10 Februari 2015 merupakan tarikh yang cukup memilukan buat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sekeluarga serta penyokong setia beliau.

Kira-kira jam 12 tengah hari, hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan sebulat suara menjatuhkan hukuman penjara 5 tahun buat ketua pembangkang itu.

Saya tidak berniat untuk mengingat kembali kes fitnah yang jijik dan meloyakan ini kerana bagi saya cukup mudah. Orang yang beriman dan berakal pasti akan menolak fitnah dan cubaan mengaibkan seseorang tanpa batas seperti yang dikenakan terhadap Anwar.

Walaupun masih ada yang mentertawakan air mata Datuk Seri Wan Azizah dan mempersendakan tangisan Nurul Izzah Anwar dan adik beradiknya yang lain, saya yakin mereka yang menganggap jasad Anwar terpenjara kali ke-2 ini merupakan sesuatu yang lucu pasti akan dibalas Allah kelak.
Walaupun sudah setahun Anwar meringkuk di dalam penjara dan tidak dapat memberi ceramah selama setahun, rakyat dapat lihat tuduhan dan pembongkaran Anwar selama ini bukan sekadar tuduhan, tetapi merupakan fakta yang tidak dapat dinafikan.

Antaranya ialah kepincangan sistem kehakiman negara. Apabila Anwar mempertikai kredibiliti badan kehakiman negara dan mengaitkan pemimpin kerajaan dengan kes beliau, penyokong Umno bukan main melenting.

“Ini keputusan mahkamah. Kena hormat”. Itulah antara ayat yang diulang beribu kali oleh mereka.

Bukan setakat penyokong Umno, malah bekas perdana menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir juga antara yang mendesak rakyat menghormati segala keputusan mahkamah.

“Rakyat mesti terima. Negara ini ditadbir dengan undang-undang”. Cukup tegas pendirian Dr Mahathir.

Malangnya, tidak sampai setahun, Dr Mahathir sudah hilang pendirian. Di dalam blognya, beliau membangkitkan kes pembunuhan wanita Mongolia Altantuya Shaariibuu dan cuba menimbulkan persoalan sama ada bekas pegawai polis Sirul Azhar Umar membunuh kerana mendapat arahan atau tidak.

Mengapa Dr Mahathir hendak bangkitkan isu ini lagi? Bukankah kes ini sudah selesai di mahkamah? Kalau benar Dr Mahathir seorang yang cukup yakin dengan sistem kehakiman negara dan tidak langsung merasakan ada campur tangan orang lain termasuk perdana menteri, mengapa mempertikai keputusan mahkamah?

Begitu juga apabila kes lucu, RM2.6 bilion yang terdapat di dalam akaun bank peribadi Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak disahkan peguam negara dana itu bukan rasuah, tetapi derma daripada dermawan Arab.

Mengapa Dr Mahathir tidak minta maaf kepada Najib selepas peguam negara membuat keputusan ini? Bukankah sebelum ini, Dr Mahathir kata wang ini tidak logik didermakan hartawan Arab dan hanya orang Arab gila sahaja yang akan menderma wang sebanyak itu.

Sekarang, peguam negara sudah sahkan. Mengapa masih tidak percaya?

Apakah Dr Mahathir dan sesetengah penyokong Umno sudah mula mempercayai dakwaan Anwar terdapat kepincangan dalam sistem kehakiman negara kita? Anwar sudah cakap lama dah.

Begitu juga sebelum Pilihan Raya Umum ke-13 (PRU13), Anwar beri jaminan jika Pakatan Rakyat mengambil alih tampuk pemerintahan, ia akan menurunkan harga petrol, air, elektrik, dan mansuhkan tol, manakala Anwar menegaskan berulang kali jika BN menang, pasti mereka akan melaksanakan cukai yang kononnya efektif, cukai barangan dan perkhidmatan (GST)? Apakah Dr Mahathir dan penyokong Umno lakukan? Sokong BN.

Akhirnya selepas Anwar dipenjara, GST dilaksanakan dan hampir setiap hari rakyat maki hamun Najib seolah-olah hanya Najib yang terlibat melaksanakan GST. Jika hanya Najib yang sokong GST, GST tidak mampu dilaksanakan.

Ini keputusan bersama barisan menteri. Kerana undian penyokong BN, menteri laksanakan GST. Sekarang, sesetengah kamu penyokong Umno membantah pula cukai ini.

Apakah kamu penyokong Umno sudah mula sedar dakwaan Anwar itu benar? Anwar sudah cakap lama dah.

Apabila Anwar dipecat sebagai timbalan perdana menteri dan diaibkan Dr Mahathir pada 1998, apa yang Anwar katakan?

“Kalau saya yang TPM diperlakukan sebegini, bagaimana pula dengan rakyat biasa? Hari ini Anwar kena, esok orang lain pula akan dilakukan sebegini jika sistem tidak diubah”.

Ketika itu, penyokong Umno tidak langsung endahkan ayat Anwar. Bagi mereka, itu hanyalah ayat retorik yang keluar dari mulut seorang yang tewas.

Selepas Anwar dipenjara, apa yang berlaku? Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Muhyiddin Yassin dan Menteri Besar Kedah, Mukhriz Mahathir dilucutkan jawatan secara tiba-tiba oleh Najib.

Apa respons penyokong Umno? Marah, kecewa, dan terkejut. Malah, Ummi Hafilda, penyokong Umno yang cukup terkenal menjaja nama buruk Anwar sendiri mengeluarkan ayat yang saling tak tumpah seperti ayat Anwar, “Kalau seorang TPM (Muhyiddin) diperlakukan sebegini, bagaimana pula rakyat biasa”.

Apakah kamu Ummi Hafilda dan penyokong Umno sudah mula sedar dakwaan Anwar itu benar? Anwar sudah cakap lama dah.

Begitu juga dengan hutang 1MDB. Sejak 2013 lagi Anwar konsisten mengkritik salah urus kewangan di bawah 1Malaysian Development Berhad (1MDB).

Semasa hutang 1MDB tidak cecah RM20 bilion lagi Anwar sudah kritik 1MDB dan mengaitkan Jho Low dengan 1MDB.

Apa respon penyokong Umno? Tiada respons langsung kerana mereka tidak ambil tahu pun.

Tetapi pada awal 2015, apabila Dr Mahathir menaikkan semula isu hutang 1MDB dan ketika itu hutang pun sudah mencecah RM43 bilion, barulah penyokong Umno mula melenting dan mempersoalkan kredibiliti kerajaan.

Barulah kita dapat lihat wajah terkejut penyokong Umno seolah-olah inilah satu-satunya kes korup yang pernah kerajaan BN lakukan.

Kalau kamu penyokong Umno sudah mula bangkit dan melawan salah urus 1MDB sejak Anwar bongkarkan, pasti hutang 1MDB tidak sebanyak itu.

Malangnya kamu terlewat. Yang pasti, kamu akhirnya bangkitkan isu yang Anwar bangkitkan 2 tahun sebelum itu.

Apakah kamu penyokong Umno sudah mula sedar dakwaan Anwar itu benar? Anwar sudah cakap lama dah.

Kepada rakyat Malaysia, khususnya penyokong Umno, sedarlah. Orang yang kamu cerca, caci, maki, dan aibkan itu, sudah lama bersuara untuk kamu.

Rajin-rajinlah mendengar ucapan Anwar atau sekurang-kurangnya lihatlah ucapan beliau di Parlimen.

Tidak ada ahli Parlimen yang konsisten mempertahankan masalah rakyat seperti isu Bernas, GST, 1MDB, kuasa rakyat, dan sebagainya seperti Anwar.

Selepas setahun Anwar dipenjara, akhirnya kamu mula sedar yang perjuangan Anwar itu benar. Anwar sudah cakap lama dah. – 9 Februari, 2016.

- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/rencana/article/anwar-sudah-cakap-lama-dah-farhan-zulkefly#sthash.8E4NAqCY.CLjvY80O.dpuf

OSA : APA YANG MAHU BERAHSIA KALAU TIDAK BUAT SALAH, TIDAK TIPU DAN TIDAK RASUAH.

Kenyataan Media.

OSA : APA YANG MAHU BERAHSIA KALAU TIDAK BUAT SALAH, TIDAK TIPU DAN TIDAK RASUAH.

1. Gegak gempita seantero dunia soal kebocoran rahsia kerajaan di Malaysia. Ada pemimpin politik saran pihak berkuasa siasat dan ambil tindakan terhadap mereka yang kononnya bocor maklumat rahsia termasuk wartawan yang melaporkan seperti surat Bank negara pada TH. Peguam Negara pula  mencadangkan pindaan OSA untuk hukuman lebih berat termasuk penjara seumur hidup dan 10 kali sebatan.

2. Saya hendak tanya kerajaan Umno Bn dan PM Najib, kenapa  takut sangat dengan kebocoran dokumen Kerajaan yang dikatakan rahsia? Apa yang hendak disembunyikan daripada rakyat? Perkara apa yang rakyat tidak boleh diberi tahu daripada dokumen yang dirahsiakan? Keselamatan negarakah atau penyelewengan rasuah yang membabitkan pemimpin yang mahu dirahsiakan daripada rakyat?

3. Najib dan kepimpinan Umno Bn serta AG masih dengan paradigma tua kuno yang beranggapan jika tidak dikawal kebocoran dokumen rahsia kerajaan, akan berlaku  krisis kepercayaan masyarakat antarabangsa terhadap Malaysia khusus terhadap pengurusan kewangan dan ekonomi negara. Sedangkan yang dikawal bukan rahsia keselamatan negara tetapi rahsia keselamatan pimpinan negara yang terlibat dengan salahlaku jenayah rasuah, penyelewengan dan salah urus yang terkandung dalam dokumen OSA.

4. Perlu dibezakan antara dokumen rahsia negara yang membabitkan keselamatan dan pertahanan yang sememangnya perlu dirahsiakan seperti logistik, plan strategi pertahanan negara dan yang berkaitan. Sedangkan  dokumen pembelian peralatan keselamatan dan pertahanan negara memungkinkan wujudnya salah urus dan  unsur rasuah seperti skandal pembelian kapal selam, dokumen yang berkaitan kontrak projek pembinaan kem tentera, balai polis dan sebagainya perlu dibebaskan daripada OSA.

5. Begitu juga dengan surat teguran Gabenor Bank Negara terhadap TH tidak perlu dilihat sebagai kebocoran rahsia sebaliknya ini adalah untu membolehkan proses semak imbang rakyat bagi memastikan  urus tadbir ekonomi dan kewangan negara lebih telus dan berintegriti serta mengelak daripada ketirisan serta kebocoran wang negara akibat daripada salah laku jenayah rasuah pemimpin negara dan pegawai awam.

6. Saya mengharap pemimpin politik negara dan rakyat serta AG mesti keluar daripada PARADIGMA TUA KUNO yang beranggapan jika tidak diOSA ke atas dokumen yang saya maksudkan maka ekonomi negara akan lumpuh tetapi sebaliknya ekonomi negara akan lebih meyakinkan kerana masyarakat antarabangsa akan lebih percaya Malaysia kerana keberanian, keterbukaan dan ketelusan dari sebarang salah laku jenayah rasuah. Jangan takut dan berahsia kalau tidak buat SALAH, TIPU dan RASUAH.

#SelamatkanMalaysia.
#BeraniKeranaBenar.

DATO' HJ MAHFUZ HJ OMAR
Ahli Parlimen Pokok Sena
10 Februari 2016/1 Jamadil Awal 1437H

ABIM TUNTUT PEMBEBASAN ANWAR IBRAHIM.

ABIM TUNTUT PEMBEBASAN ANWAR IBRAHIM.

Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM) menyeru rakyat Malaysia mengimbau semula pemenjaraan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang genap setahun pada 10 Februari 2016.

Sesungguhnya peristiwa pemenjaraan Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim, mantan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia dan Ketua Pembangkang merupakan peristiwa hitam yang tragis dalam sejarah politik dan perkembangan demokrasi negara yang kita cintai.

Anwar Ibrahim merupakan simbol dan lambang keberanian pemimpin yang sanggup mengambil segala risiko - hatta mengorbankan kebebasannya jasadnya - demi perjuangan membela hak rakyat dan menyanggah kezaliman elit pemerintah.

Tampak semakin jelas, dalam situasi negara yang terus-terusan dilanda krisis kepimpinan dan integriti yang mencemar reputasi rakyat Malaysia seantero dunia, pemimpin berjiwa besar yang sanggup mengenepikan kepentingan peribadi bagi menempuhi perit-jerih perjuangan bersama rakyat terbanyak semakin sukar dicari.

Justeru amatlah malang; tatkala negara memerlukan lonjakan gergasi untuk segera keluar dari kemelut sosio-politik dan ekonomi yang kian mencengkam, pemimpin pejuang rakyat yang komitmennya telah diuji dan kualiti kepimpinan telah diiktiraf di peringkat antarabangsa di dibiarkan mendekam di penjara selama 5 tahun.

Anwar Ibrahim - tanpa ragu - merupakan seorang tahanan politik yang dipenjarakan secara arbitrari, yakni pemenjaraan salah yang dilakukan tanpa bersandarkan bukti yang kukuh.  

Kumpulan Kerja Penahanan Arbitrari, Persatuan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention – UNWGAD) telah sebulat suara mendapati Anwar dipenjarakan secara haram, dan melanggar undang-undang antarabangsa melalui Pendapat No. 22/2015:

“Pemenjaraan Saudara (Anwar) Ibrahim adalah arbitrari. . . mengambil kira semua hal dalam kes tersebut, Kumpulan Kerja ini berpendapat bahawa jalan untuk membetulkan keadaan adalah untuk membebaskan Saudara (Anwar) Ibrahim dengan serta merta, dan memastikan hak-hak politik beliau yang dirampas oleh kerana pemenjaraan beliau ini dikembalikan”.

Pemenjaraan politik bukanlah sesuatu yang baru lagi menghairankan.

Dalam apa pun nama sistem dan istilahnya dalam liku-liku sejarah peradaban manusiawi, hakikatnya tetap sama -  bahawa wujud insan-insan tidak berdosa sepanjang zaman yang dihumbankan di balik jeriji dek pertuduhan palsu yang menjengkelkan dan dakwaan memualkan! 

Hanya segelintir yang buta sejarah berani menafikan betapa undang-undang telah disalahgunakan oleh pemegang tampuk kekuasaan untuk memenjarakan secara zalim seteru politik dan para penentang yang lantang memperjuangkan prinsip kebenaran dan keadilan.

Demikianlah juga, hanya pemerintah yang telah tercabut rasa kemanusiaannya laksana Al Sisi dan Shekh Hasina yang tega memekakkan telinga dan memejamkan mata dan terus-terusan membelenggu musuh politik sementelahan dikutuk masyarakat bertamadun seantero dunia.

Walaupun demikian, ABIM berkeyakinan majoriti rakyat Malaysia masih punya ketinggian akalbudi, naluri kesedaran yang mendalam dan dhamir yang suci, untuk mengakui hakikat bahawa Anwar Ibrahim merupakan mangsa politik keji konspirator, yang sanggup menggunakan apa sahaja helah bagi mengaibkan dan merampas hak kebebasan seteru yang tidak dapat ditundukkan dalam gelanggang politik demoktratik -- secara budiman, adil dan saksama.

Pertuduhan dan sabitan kesalahan seksual ke atas beliau melalui kerahan dan sebaran propaganda lucah yang diarusperdanakan buat tontonan umum telah meninggalkan warisan memori yang memalukan khususnya buat generasi muda negara.

ABIM menilai bahawa seluruh episod serangan yang jijik terhadap peribadi DSAI telah membiakkan budaya fitnah dalam masyarakat dan menyuburkan amalan Qazaf - menuduh wanita dan lelaki yang baik berzina atau liwat tanpa mendatangkan 4 orang saksi - yang amat dibenci oleh ajaran agama.

Bahkan sebaliknya, penekanan terhadap pemeliharaan maruah (hifz ‘ird) dan kemuliaan insaniah yang digariskan dalam objektif pensyariatan Islam telah dilanggar dengan wewenangnya dalam siri serangan propaganda terhadap beliau.

Sahsiah peribadi dan komitmen keIslaman Anwar Ibrahim, yang diiktiraf oleh ulama-ulama’ muktabar dan cendiakawan Islam di pelbagai belahan dunia dari usia mudanya sewaktu memimpin gerakan Islam sehinggalah saat dan tika ini telah tercalar dan tercemar dengan tuduhan Qazaf yang dipropagandakan pada peringkat nasional.

Marilah kita bersama-sama merenung dan menghayati mesej penting Syeikh Dr. Yusuf Qaradhawi dalam surat umumnya kepada seluruh rakyat Malaysia pada 27 Oktober 2014 sewaktu Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim melalui fasa-fasa terakhir kes perbicaraan beliau di Mahkamah Persekutuan:

“Dalam kaitan inilah, Anwar Ibrahim adalah seorang pemimpin besar. Dengan jejak sejarah perjuangan dan pengalamannya, kesabaran, ketahanan dan kegigihannya sejak muda hingga sekarang, seharusnya beliau dihormati dan dilayani selayaknya, sesuai dengan perjuangannya, dan tidak wajar sama sekali beliau dilempari tuduhan-tuduhan palsu yang tidak berasas.”

Bersempena genap setahun penahanan Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim pada 10 Februari 2016, ABIM dengan ini menuntut agar Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim dibebaskan segera  secara sah menurut saluran perundangan dan dibersihkan dari segala sabitannya melalui semakan kehakiman yang sedang diusahakan oleh barisan peguam beliau.

Sementara proses tersebut berlangsung, beliau haruslah diberikan segala haknya sebagai tahanan politik yang dijamin di bawah perundangan antarabangsa termasuklah hak bagi mendapatkan rawatan berterusan menurut pilihannya bagi mengubati kesakitan dan kecederaan beliau yang kini telahpun berusia 68 tahun. 

ABIM turut menuntut agar hak untuk bertemu dengan peguam-peguam beliau yang dijamin oleh peruntukan undang-undang diberikan sepenuhnya tanpa sekatan-sekatan politik dan birokratik yang menjejaskan akses beliau terhadap nasihat perundangan yang selayaknya. Keluarga Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim juga haruslah diberikan akses sepenuhnya untuk bersua, bertemu mata dan berkomunikasi tanpa sebarang halangan dengan beliau sewaktu di penjara.

Akhir sekali, jika ada satu pengajaran penting yang perlu kita insafi dari peristiwa pemenjaraan insan bernama Anwar Ibrahim ialah beliau mengajar setiap daripada rakyat Malaysia yang cintakan kebenaran dan keadilan untuk menjadi berani – berani menyatakan keberanan dan keadilan, dan berani menguasai ketakutan yang membelenggu diri dari menyatakan dengan penuh lantang bangkangan terhadapan kebatilan dan kezaliman.

Inilah mesej penting pemimpin pejuang rakyat seperti yang diungkapkan oleh pejuang pembebasan apartheid Nelson Mandela; “I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man in not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear”.

Jika takut pada risiko, jangan bicara soal perjuangan!

MOHAMAD RAIMI AB.RAHIM
Presiden

Selasa, 9 Februari 2016

SALAM PERJUANGAN UNTUK MU BANG ANWAR (DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM).

SALAM PERJUANGAN UNTUK MU BANG ANWAR (DATUK SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM).

1. Sudah genap setahun Bang Anwar dalam kepongan pagar besi Penjara Sg Buluh kerana kerana dendam politik yang tak sudah Najib dan kepimpinan Umno Bn. Bang Anwar terpenjara akibat dendam politik kerana perjuangan membenteras salah guna kuasa, rasuah dan penyelewengan.

2. Bang Anwar telah merubah lanskap politik Malaysia dengan satu pengorbanan yang sangat besar dengan memilih jalan dihumban ke penjara demi kebangkitan sebuah perjuangan bukan untuk kebebasan dirinya tetapi untuk kebebasan dan kemerdekaan bangsa dan negara tercinta.

3. Saya percaya, Bang Anwar boleh memilih jalan selamat dengan meninggalkan politik perjuangan untuk hidup senang bersama keluarga dengan mencari kesenangan dan kekayaan dengan menjual maruah harga diri perjuangan. Tetapi yang dipilih jalan ke penjara. Tiada makna pada kaharuman nama dipuji orang untuk Bang Anwar saja-saja merengkok dalam penjara.

4. Jalan ke penjara dan kehidupan di sebalik jeriji besi yang diharungi adalah mesej untuk kebangkitan perjuangan rakyat membebaskan dan memerdekakan negara dan rakyat daripada politik rakus, tamak dan kegilaan pemimpin negara Umno Bn yang berkuasa yang menghumban kehidupan rakyat terperosok dalam kesempitan kesusahan akibat salah guna kuasa.

5. Terima kasih Bang Anwar kerana sanggup membakar diri mu untuk masa depan anak bangsa dan negara tercinta. Saya doakan untuk Allah memberkati dan merahmati kehidupan Bang Anwar dan keluarga buat selamanya, kuatkan semangat, tabah dan sabar dalam meniti erti kehidupan perjuangan. Penguasa Umno Bn yang zalim hanya boleh memenjara tubuh Mu tetapi mereka tidak berupaya memenjara akal dan pemikiran Bang Anwar. Salam perjuangan daripada saya yang tak berkesempatan berhimpun di hadapan penjara Sg Buluh sempena genap setahun Bang Anwar di sana. Saya doakan untuk pembebasan Bang Anwar.

#BebasAnwar
#BeraniKeranaBenar
#SelamakanMalaysia

DATO' HJ MAHFUZ HJ OMAR
Ahli Parlimen Pokok Sena
9 Februari 2016/30 Rabiulakhir 1437H.

Kronologi konspirasi jatuhkan Anwar

Kronologi konspirasi jatuhkan Anwar

UMNO Barisan Nasional (BN) mewujudkan senario paling buruk dalam politik Malaysia dengan melaksanakan usaha memfitnah Anwar Ibrahim secara berterusan sejak 1998.

Selama sedekad mereka mencipta konspirasi yang amat kejam merobek maruah seorang pemimpin berjiwa Islam yang membela rakyat. 

Meskipun Presiden Umno telah tiga kali bertukar tangan namun musuh politik parti itu dan para pemimpinnya tetap tidak berubah.

Anwar yang menjadi Timbalan Perdana Menteri (PM) dijatuhkan pada 1998 kerana keengganan beliau bersetuju dengan arahan Dr Mahathir Mohamad menyelamatkan syarikat salah seorang anak PM itu yang hampir muflis menggunakan dana Petronas sejumlah RM1 bilion. 

Anwar juga tidak bersetuju menyelamatkan beberapa kroni penting Umno BN lain yang tenggelam dibadai krisis kewangan Asia 1998. 

Kroni Dr Mahathir khuatir Anwar akan memusnahkan mereka sekiranya dibenarkan menjadi Perdana Menteri Malaysia. 

Oleh itu mereka memutuskan Anwar perlu disingkir.

Akibatnya, satu konspirasi diatur mereka-cipta tuduhan Anwar meliwat bekas pemandu peribadi isterinya, Azizan Abu Bakar. 

Skrip bermula dengan Azizan dibawa oleh Ummi Hafilda Ali menghadap PM Dr Mahathir mengadu menjadi mangsa liwat.

Kemudian Dr Mahathir memecat Anwar dengan alasan timbalannya mengamalkan seks luar tabie. 

Anwar mendakwa konspirasi menjatuhkannya melibatkan beberapa orang rakan karib Dr Mahathir seperti Daim Zainudin, Aziz Shamsudin, Peguam Negara Mokhtar Abdullah dan beberapa orang hakim.

Sepuluh tahun kemudian, pemimpin Umno BN sekali lagi berdepan dengan kemungkinan Anwar akan diangkat menjadi Perdana Menteri selepas Pakatan Rakyat (PR) berjaya menafikan majoriti 2/3 kerusi Parlimen BN. 

Khabar angin 40 Ahli Parlimen BN akan menyeberang ke PR selepas Anwar menang Pilihan Raya Kecil Permatang Pauh pada Ogos 2008 menyebabkan mereka merasakan perlunya Anwar disingkir dari dunia politik.

Maka konspirasi kedua diatur. Kali ini melibatkan seorang budak pejabat Anwar bernama Saiful Bukhari. 

Beliau mendakwa diliwat oleh Anwar di sebuah kondominium. Sekali lagi skrip lama digunakan.

Mangsa dibawa berjumpa Perdana Menteri, Najib Razak mengadu telah diliwat. 

Kebimbangan hilangnya kepercayaan rakyat terhadap perbicaraan kes fitnah II yang tidak berjaya mencipta bukti kukuh menentang Anwar berikutan keterangan saksi yang kabur dan terdapatnya DNA lebih dari seorang lelaki di dubur Saiful, termasuk DNA Saiful sendiri menyebabkan pemimpin Umno BN sekali lagi gusar Anwar akan kembali kuat menjelang pilihanraya ke-13.

Risikan BN terhadap situasi di Sawarak menjelang pilihanraya negeri memperlihatkan penolakan rakyat terhadap propaganda BN. 

Sekiranya negeri yang mana penduduk pribumi kekurangan maklumat telah menolak BN, maka keadaan akan menjadi lebih sukar di Semenanjung yang rata-rata penduduknya membaca bahan-bahan dari internet.

Maka menjelang pilihanraya Sarawak pada April 2011, satu lagi fitnah direka-cipta. 

Kali ini menggunakan video seks yang dilakonkan oleh lelaki mirip wajah Anwar Ibrahim. 

Dengan harapan kebangkitan rakyat Sarawak dan Semenanjung boleh dipadamkan apabila menonton pemimpin mereka melakukan adegan seks.

Sekali lagi skrip lama digunakan. Menjelang pilihanraya Sarawak, polis mengumumkan siasatan menjurus ke arah ketulenan video dan pemilik jam tangan Omega yang didakwa kepunyaan Anwar. 

Sedangkan laporan polis oleh Anwar mengadu difitnah tidak disiasat segera oleh pihak polis. 

Pendedahan klip video di internet yang tidak dihalang dengan segera mendakwa Trio Datuk T juga menjadi tanda-tanya kerana individu yang mendedahkan klip video seks Presiden MCA, Chua Soi Lek ditangkap selepas seminggu klip berkenaan tersebar.

Namun konspirasi demi konspirasi ini semakin menjemukan rakyat Malaysia yang inginkan suasana politik yang membela kebajikan mereka. 

Bukannya melibatkan integriti skandal dan permainan politik yang tidak berkesudahan..

Yak Names Eric Tan And Jho Low As Being Under Investigation by Singapore Authorities

Yak Names Eric Tan And Jho Low As Being Under Investigation by Singapore Authorities

9 FEB 2016

Documents from Jho Low and 1MDB’s banker

Given that both 1MDB and Jho Low have continued to publicly insist that the businessman played no role at the development fund whatsoever, after it changed its name from Terengganu Investment Authority in 2009, it is for them embarrassing that their mutual bank manager has declared otherwise in statements before the Singapore courts.

The affidavits and documents provided by Yak Yew Chee add to the mounds of evidence confirming that Low was, to the contrary. a linchpin in 1MDB’s various “investment” operations.

Moreover, they are particularly hard to deny.

After all, in a statement which Yak drew up in collaboration with his own BSI Bank bosses, Yak has acknowledged that he was the relationship manager for Jho Low and 1MDB Global and its subsidiary Brazen Sky, as well as what is believed to be the bogus Aabar Investments PJS Limited, based in the BVI.

The approved statement further describes Low, these companies and “their affiliates” as all being “closely linked” in “a matrix of relationships” – VERY different to Low’s denial that he had any continuing links with 1MDB:

“..relating to the accounts with BSI Group held by Brazen Sky Ltd, Jho Taek Low, 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB, Aabar Investments PJSC (Aabar) and/or their respective affiliates … we would clarify that the additional parties named are closely linked in the matrix of business relationships involving 1MDB/Brazen and Low..”[Yak’s negotiated statement with his bosses at BSI]


Mr Yak has also been reported as managing accounts for none other than the mysterious and opaque former subsidiary of 1MDB called SRC International, which is headed up by Low’s close associate Nik Faisal Arif Kamil, now directly under Najib’s Ministry of Finance.

RM4 billion of public pension money from KWAP has disappeared into SRC and have been largely unaccounted for.

1MDB’s spokespeople therefore surely owe Malaysia their latest updated version of events, in order to accommodate this new information, which has so definitively nailed the lie that 1MDB and Jho Low had no relationship after 2009.

Who is Eric Tan (Tan Kim Loong)? 

Yak cited another name was cited besides Jho Low’s in his affidavits.

The bank manager made clear, as a person under investigation himself, that he was aware that both his client Low and a certain Tan Kim Loong, better known as Eric Tan, are indeed being actively investigated by the Singapore authorities:

“I believe that the reason for this seizure [of Yak’s accounts by the Commercial Affairs Department] is due to the ongoing investigations into Jho Taek Low and Tan Kim Loong” stated Yak in paragraph 10 of his affidavit of 23rd November 2015.


So, who is this Eric Tan also being investigated in the Jho Low/ 1MDB affair in Singapore?

Sarawak Report can reveal key documents which show that Yak, Jho Low and Eric Tan were indeed involved in transactions together, with respect to a financial transaction that has already beenreported in Singapore.

In April last year news leaked that a company named ACME Time Limited transferred US$20 million via Coutts Bank in Singapore to a Swiss Bank account belonging to none other than the PetroSaudi Director Tarek Obaid, partner in the original joint venture with 1MDB.

The transfer took place 30th September 2009, which was the day after that joint venture was signed. Our copy of the transfer document references Mr Yak (who was still in the last days of his previous job at Coutts Bank Singapore) and a colleague at the bank.

 

Sent from RBS Coutts to a JP Morgan Suisse account

There is no doubting that the payment was indeed being made to Tarek Obaid, because the bank account number at JP Morgan matches correspondence obtained by Sarawak Report from PetroSaudi’s own email server, thanks to whistleblower Xavier Justo:

Jonathan Connor of JP Morgan Swiss updated Obaid on the state of the account the following year

Role of Eric Tan

The involvement of Eric Tan, is clear from the fact that it was he who sent the above document both to Tarek Obaid and to his PetroSaudi fellow director Patrick Mahony, as part of an email trail identified by Sarawak Report.

The email trail was under the subject heading “Re: Wire Instructions to Sheikh Tareq Obaid”, under which Eric Tan (Kim Loong) sent his correspondents this and another document, which is clearly therefore related.

 

Investment Management Agreement attached

The second attached document was a so-called IMA [Investment Management Agreement], which Sarawak Report has earlier reported on.

This “IMA  agreement, which appears to have been drawn up by Eric Tan and was also dated on 30th September 2009, turns out to be none other than that between Jho Low’s company Good Star Limitedand Patrick Mahony, giving Mahony a 2% management fee to look after US$85 million on behalf of Good Star Limited.

So, there we have it, once again.  Jho Low, 1MDB and PetroSaudi all tied up in a “matrix” of activities, which are now under scrutiny by the Singapore authorities.

Mahony gets the contract with Good Star – the Jho Low company that siphoned US$700 million from the PetroSaudi deal

Was this an upfront payment to Mahony and Obaid, supposedly to “manage” the US$85 million ‘investment’, which Low sent on to Tarek Obaid shortly after?

If so, it was an interesting form of management by Mahony, who just a week afterwards, as we have documented, placed a further US$33 million into his own JP Morgan Swiss bank account and then put down over US£6 million on a posh new house in Notting Hill.

It seems Jho Low’s Good Star didn’t care about any of that.

After all, as all Malaysia knows, Jho Low’s Good Star had the day before, on 29th September, just banked (with the assistance of Yak Yew Chee’s own RBS Coutts bank) a whopping $700 million stolen from 1MDB, thanks to vital assistance from Mahony and Obaid, who had allowed their company PetroSaudi to “act as a front” for the deal.

 


Isnin, 8 Februari 2016

SEMUA HARUS BERI SOKONGAN

SEMUA HARUS BERI SOKONGAN

Tidak kira siapa pun kita, asalkan rakyat Malaysia yang cintakan kebenaran dan keadilan, seharusnya memberi sokongan kepada petisyen ini tanpa sebarang keraguan.

Jangan sesekali dilihat siapa yang menggerakkannya, tetapi lihatlah nilai dan kepentingannya kepada masa depan negara.

Tambahan pula isu berkaitan dana yang masuk ke akaun peribadi Najib Razak itu sudah menjadi begitu kalut, haru biru dan semakin tidak menentu jadinya.

Moga-moga dengan jayanya mengumpul sejuta tandatangan secara maya, jika lebih daripada sejuta tentunya lagi baik, akan dapat membuka hati Yang Dipertuan Agong untuk segera campurtangan dan membenarkan siasatan dibuka semula terhadap Najib.

Petisyen boleh diperolehi di  sini.".https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1V9BtH3DXlsst-wqp3WoLSyMi2K8x8oTUq0Ppejy9Wio/viewform?c=0&w=1.

Oleh itu, ayuh kita semua berganding bahu memberikan sokongan kepada petisyen tersebut. (SH 07/02/2016).

Ahad, 7 Februari 2016

MALAYA MENGUBAH FAKTA SEJARAH KENEGARAAN DAN MENJAJAH MINDA RAKYAT SABAH DAN SARAWAK MELALUI SISTEM PENDIDIKAN

MALAYA MENGUBAH FAKTA SEJARAH KENEGARAAN DAN MENJAJAH MINDA RAKYAT SABAH DAN SARAWAK MELALUI SISTEM PENDIDIKAN

Mengikut Suruhanjaya Cobbold 1961/62, Laporan IGC 1962,Perjanjian Malaysia 1963 dan Perlembagaan Persekutuan Malaysia 1963 yang asal, Negara Sabah dan Negara Sarawak adalah berstatus 'Negara' dan bukan 'Negeri' dalam 'Persekutuan Tanah Melayu (Malaya)'; dan bukan 'Negeri' dalam Persekutuan Malaysia 1963 tetapi berstatus 'Negara'! Penulis Buku Teks Sejarah tersebut jahil sejarah kenegaraan dan sengaja memesong/ mengubah fakta sejarah kenegaraan untuk merealisasikan 'Agenda Penjajahan Malaya' ke atas Sabah dan Sarawak!

Negara-negara yang membentuk Persekutuan Malaysia pada 16 September 1963 terdiri daripada gabungan empat buah 'Negara', iaitu Negara Malaya (Persekutuan Tanah Melayu), Negara Singapura, Negara Sarawak dan Negara North Borneo (Sabah)!

Pihak-pihak tertentu yang berkepentingan di Malaya tidak ada cara untuk menipu, membohongi atau mengubah fakta sejarah kenegaraan yang asal tentang Penubuhan Persekutuan Malaysia kerana dokumen-dokumen asal yang berkaitan tersimpan di Negara Singapura, Negara Sarawak, Negara North Borneo (Sabah), United Kingdom dan beberapa negara komanwel serta negara-negara lain di Eropah dan Amerika Syarikat.

Kerajaan Sabah dan Sarawak sekarang MESTI menghantar Surat Bantahan Rasmi kepada KPM, LPM, MPM, Bahagian Perkembangan Kurikulum dan Bahagian Buku Teks! Buku Teks Sejarah Sekolah yang mengandungi fakta sejarah yang salah MESTI DIHARAMKAN sebelum rakyat atau pelajar keliru, tersesat dan dijajah minda! Ini satu 'Agenda Penjajahan Minda' pihak-pihak tertentu di Malaya terhadap rakyat Sabah dan Sarawak' untuk tujuan penjajahan yang lebih meluas! Penjajahan ini mesti dihentikan dan ditentang habis-habisan!!!

"Penjajahan paling kejam dalam sejarah penjajahan adalah dengan mengubah fakta sejarah kenegaraan sesebuah negara dan bangsa" - DJI/CWC&KBSN40L/090216/0102AM

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1259638644051844&set=a.328805567135161.99823.100000171617465&type=3

Lim Kit Siang, menyifatkan orang Melayu tetap kekal berkuasa di negara ini dan sama sekali tidak akan kehilangannya.

KUALA LUMPUR: Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang, menyifatkan orang Melayu tetap kekal berkuasa di negara ini dan sama sekali tidak akan kehilangannya.

Katanya, perkara itu jelas berdasarkan bilangan kerusi Parlimen, yang mana 114 kerusi adalah majoriti Melayu daripada 162 kerusi di Semenanjung.

Kit Siang berkata, kerusi Parlimen yang didominasi kaum Cina hanya sebanyak 22 sahaja dan 29 kerusi lagi adalah bercampur dan tiada kerusi Parlimen didominasi komuniti India.

“Statistik menunjukkan Malaysia adalah negara yang didominasi populasi Melayu. Lebih 50% penduduk adalah Melayu dan Cina kurang daripada 30%. Kaum lain hanya menyumbang sedikit peratus,” katanya ketika majlis makan malam DAP di sini, malam tadi.

Mengulas lanjut, Ahli Parlimen Gelang Patah itu berkata, demografi Malaysia membuktikan Melayu kekal berkuasa dan menjadi suara dominan di negara ini.

“Tumbangnya Perdana Menteri (Datuk Seri Najib Razak) dan UMNO dalam pilihan raya tidak akan menjejaskan apa-apa. Negara ini tetap dipunyai dan dipegang orang Melayu,” katanya.

Kit Siang berkata, beliau menjangkakan serangan persepsi bahawa DAP anti Islam dan anti Melayu diperhebatkan menjelang pilihan raya akan datang.

Sabtu, 6 Februari 2016

NAJIB DIMALUKAN OLEH ARAB SAUDI, MASIH BERWIBAWAKAH KEPUTUSAN PEGUAM NEGARA?

NAJIB DIMALUKAN OLEH ARAB SAUDI, MASIH BERWIBAWAKAH KEPUTUSAN PEGUAM NEGARA?

Semasa kecil, kita tentunya biasa dipesan oleh ibu bapa, guru-guru atau orang tua-tua agar jangan sesekali bercakap bohong kepada sesiapa pun jua.

Jika kita didapati melakukan sesuatu kesalahan pula, perkara pertama yang diingatkan ialah agar segera bercakap benar dan tidak terus berbohong.

Kalau tidak salah, berkatalah tidak salah, manakala jika salah, mengaku dan berterus-terang sajalah.

Berbohong atau bercakap bohong bukan saja dianggap dosa dan perbuatan tidak baik, bahkan selalu diingatkan bahawa bagaimana sekali pun cuba berbohong, ia pasti akan terdedah akhirnya walaupun setelah dicuba beberapa lapis pembohongan lainnya.

Dikatakan bahawa apabila kita berbohong dan cuba menutupnya  setelah ianya terdedah, kita akan terus berbohong lagi dan lagi sehingga akhirnya terjerat sendiri.

Peribahasa moden juga ada mengingatkan bahawa kita tidak mungkin dapat menipu semua orang dalam semua keadaan.

Pendeknya, pembohongan tidak mungkin ada tempat yang selesa di dunia ini, apatah lagi di akhirat nanti.

Barangkali inilah yang hampir-hampir ada persamaan dengan isu derma RM2,600 juta yang masuk ke akaun bank peribadi Najib Razak.

Mula-mula wang itu dinafikan, diancam mahu disaman, dikatakan tidak mungkin Najib begitu bodoh membenarkan wang sebegitu banyak dimasukkan ke akuan peribadinya dan segala macam bentuk penafian lainnya.

Kemudian apabila hakikat kebenaran berkaitan wang itu sukar dinafikan, ia diakui sebagai derma politik, hak Najib menerima sumbangan daripada mana-mana pihak, untuk memerangi keganasan,  mengalahkan DAP, sumbangan kerana memperjuangkan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah dan lain-lain lagi.

Ia juga dikatakan untuk membiayai politik UMNO yang mana segala halnya memerlukan wang dan Najib selaku Presiden UMNO dikatakan hanyalah pemegang amanah saja kepada duit tersebut.

Ketika Peguam Negara, Apandi Ali mengumumkan hasil siasatan yang membersihkan nama Najib daripada semua pertuduhan jenayah berkaitan wang itu, diumumkan juga wang tersebut diterima daripada keluarga Diraja Arab Saudi dan sejumlah RM2,030 juta sudah pun dipulangkan kerana ia tidak digunapakai.

Siapa keluarga Diraja Arab Saudi yang menderma itu tidak pernah didedahkan, kecuali media-media antarabangsa mengatakan paling mungkin ianya ialah Raja Abdullah yang mangkat pada Januari 2015 lalu.

Kesimpulannya, oleh kerana wang itu adalah derma dan sudah pun dipulangkan sebahagian besar daripadanya, maka Najib dianggap tidak bersalah apa-apa serta bersih sebersih-bersihnya oleh Peguam Negara.

Tetapi hari ini semuanya bagaikan terdedah apabila Menteri Luar Arab Saudi, Adel Al-Jubeir menolak tanggapan bahawa wang yang pernah masuk ke akuan peribadi Najib itu suatu bentuk derma atau daripada kerajaan negara tersebut.

Sebagaimana yang dilaporkan oleh New York Times, Adel Al-Jubeir menegaskan, wang itu adalah daripada warga persendirian Saudi dan diberikan kepada satu pelaburan di Malaysia.

Sekarang apa sudah jadi?

Siapa yang dilihat berbohong dan tidak berkata benar?

Oleh kerana ia bukan derma, pelaburan untuk apa wang sebanyak RM2,600 juta itu dan mengapa ia dimasukkan ke dalam akaun peribadi Najib?

Jika benar ia dipulangkan pula sebagaimana yang diakui oleh Apandi Ali, mengapa hanya  RM2,030 juta saja dikembalikan? Apa jadi dengan yang selebihnya?

Lebih ingin diketahui ialah bagaimana dengan keputusan Peguam Negara yang membersihkan nama Najib kerana percaya wang tersebut adalah derma dan sebahagiannya besarnya sudah dikembalikan?

Dengan pengakuan Menteri Luar  Arab Saudi sendiri bahawa wang tersebut bukan derma, masih berwibawakah keputusan Peguam Negara itu?

Apakah ini antara sebab-sebab mengapa Peguam Negara mengarahkan SPRM menutup terus siasatan terhadap Najib dan tidak memberi laluan untuk undang-undang bersama atau MLA digunakan yang membolehkan dokumen-dokumen di luar negara berkaitan pengaliran wang itu diperolehi?

Akhirnya, inilah akibatnya apabila mengabaikan pesanan ibu bapa, guru-guru atau orang tua-tua mengenai perbuatan berbohong yang tentunya semua orang pernah menerimanya semasa kecil-kecil dulu. (SH 06/02/2016).

Saya bukanlah anak Kedah. Cuma mahu luahkan perasaan tidak puas hati kepada UMNO Kedah

Assalamualaikum Dato..

Saya bukanlah anak Kedah.
Cuma saya ingin berkongsi rasa dan menyatakan apa yang terbuku dalam hati saya kerana saya adalah anak muda yang berdarah UMNO.

Apa yang berlaku selama 2 minggu ini benar-benar merenggut ketenangan saya sebagai anak kelahiran Pulau Pinang.

Apa yang terjadi, diluar batas pemikiran saya.
Terkejut..
Kecewa..
Sedih..
Hiba..
Sayu..
Semua perasaan bercampur baur.

Saya sempat berbual melalui telefon dengan salah seorang Ketua UMNO Bahagian dari Kedah ketika beliau dalam perjalanan ke Hotel Grand Alora pada hari PC Ketua-ketua UMNO Bahagian menyatakan hilang sokongan kepada Mukhriz Mahathir.

Saya tanya apa yang berlaku?
Jawab beliau..
'MB kurang memberi'.

Tanya saya..
'Kurang memberi apa lagi?
Projek?
Tender ataupun jawatan GLC Negeri?'

Dia hanya menjawab..
'Aeiza tak faham..'

Tetapi akhirnya beliau mengaku bahawa Ketua-ketua Bahagian diberi RM50K sebagai saguhati kerana hadir ketika PC di Hotel Grand Alora.
Dan juga RM5K kepada Ketua-ketua Sayap Bahagian.
Semurah tu nilai maruah Ketua-ketua Bahagian dan Sayap di Kedah walaupun ada yang mengaku tidak tahu tujuan PC diadakan.

Jadi kami cuma minta fahamkan kami..
Berikan alasan mengapa..
Kami tidak akan menolak jika ianya memberi kebaikan kepada parti tetapi jika membuatkan sebuah Negeri kembali kalah ke tangan pembangkang jadi untuk apa?
Untuk apa jika ianya mendatangkan musibah malah perpecahan kepada parti?

Persoalannya yang paling misteri, kenapa sekarang?
Ditengah UMNO sendiri terpalit dengan pelbagai isu yang tidak dijawab, ditambah lagi isu yang bisa membangkitkan kemarahan rakyat terutamanya anak muda?

Paling ketara, Ketua-ketua Bahagian ini menyatakan hilang kepercayaan kepada Menteri Besar dan bukannya sebagai Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan UMNO Negeri.
Bukannya ADUN BN yang menyatakan hilang kepercayaan kepada Menteri Besar tetapi Ketua-ketua Bahagian.
Kemudian barulah Timbalan Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan kejar seorang demi seorang ADUN BN dan meminta mereka menandatangani surat Akuan Berkanun sehinggakan YB Datuk Sabrina juga menandatangani surat berkenaan walaupun ditahan dalam wad di Hospital KPJ, Bandar Perda.

Mainan politik apakah ini?
Gila apakah yang sedang berlaku didalam UMNO yang kami sayangi?

Siapa boleh menafikan bahawa faktor kemenangan UMNO dan BN di Kedah adalah disebabkan seorang anak muda yang bernama Mukhriz Mahathir?

Saya tidak memihak mana-mana pihak.
Cuma sudah terlalu banyak isu, kontoversi, tindakan dan keputusan yang dibuat oleh kepimpinan atasan yang dilihat makin lama makin memakan diri.

Adakah Kedah nak terima nasib seperti Pulau Pinang?

Tetapi tidak disangka apabila Kedah berjaya ditakluk, ini yang terjadi.
Selepas TSMY dan DS Shafie Afdal, kini giliran Mukhriz pulak.
Sibodoh yang tak faham politik pun bijak menilai kenapa.

Benar bahawa pemimpin datang silih berganti.
Kepentingan parti perlu diutamakan.
Tetapi atas kesalahan apakah Mukhriz Mahathir perlu dihukum sebegini rupa?
Hanya kerana Mukhriz Mahathir lantang bersuara?

Kami mulai sedar Dato..
Pemimpin kami diatas dah kurang mendengar.
Dipekakkan telinga, dibutakan mata dan masih dalam sindrom penafian.

'Menjaga' pemimpin Bahagian dengan beri habuan semata-mata untuk mengekalkan kuasa.

Kami bukan pekak.
Juga bukan tuli yang hanya terima segala perbuatan kepimpinan atasan.
Kami lihat, kami dengar, kami baca, kami berbual, kami timbang, kami bincang, kami rasa dan kami cari jawapan.

Tetapi kami tahu, suara kami tidak akan kemana.
Tidak akan didengar.

Apabila Mukhriz letak jawatan, bukan sahaja rakyat Kedah merasa kesannya.
Kami di Pulau Pinang juga terkena tempiasnya.

Maka, telah ditanam hasrat sejak dari awal lagi, jika Mukhriz turun dari jawatan MB Kedah, UMNO bukan lagi pilihan kami.

Kami terpaksa.
Kerana kami kesal..
Bukan UMNO ini yang kami mahukan..

Kami anak muda yang benar-benar sayangkan UMNO.
Kepada UMNO tempat kami bersandar, bergantung harap.

Sampaikan salam kami anak-anak muda UMNO kepada DS Mukhriz jika Dato berpeluang bertemu beliau.
Sampaikan pesanan kami anak-anak muda UMNO agar beliau teruskan bersuara lantang selagi ianya benar.
Kami akan sokong!

Beliaulah sebenarnya pemimpin yang berjiwa besar!

Kepada Allah kami berserah.

Aeiza Hassan
Ketua Pergerakan Puteri
UMNO Bahagian Bayan Baru,
Pulau Pinang
Exco Pergerakan Puteri
UMNO Malaysia

Jumaat, 5 Februari 2016

"Donor" Prince Turki Received US$77 Million From 1MDB EXPOSE!

"Donor" Prince Turki Received US$77 Million From 1MDB EXPOSE!

5 FEB 2016

Nawaf Obaid – always willing to give a ‘Saudi insider’ explanation to western journalists.

When foreign news journalists asked Najib’s media coordinator, ex-APCO man Paul Stadlen, last week for the name of the Saudi Royal, claimed to have donated RM2.6 billion to the PM’s election effort, he disappointed them.

Sadly, the Saudi royal family did not wish to reveal any further information, he explained.

On the other hand, Stadlen urged journalists to check out a very ‘insightful’ BBC article, which claimed that the donor was none other than the former King Abdullah, who died last January, acting together with his 7th son, Prince Turki.

The gift came partly from the King’s own money and partly from the coffers of the State of Saudi Arabia itself, added the BBC’s Middle East defence correspondent, who later admitted to Sarawak Report that he knows nothing about Malaysia.

“The $681m (£479m) deposited in the bank account of Malaysian PM Najib Razak by Saudi Arabia was to help him win the 2013 elections, a Saudi source says…. The Saudi source said the donation was made amid concern in Riyadh about the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood…The well-placed Saudi source, who has asked not to be named, told the BBC the payment was authorised from the very top – from Saudi Arabia’s late King Abdullah – with funds coming from both his personal finances and state funds.”[BBC – Saudi gift to Malaysia PM Najib Razak ‘for election campaign‘]


Few journalists in KL are in any doubt as to who “the well-placed Saudi source, who has asked not to be named” was.

It is widely agreed by a chortling foreign press corps that the ‘deep throat’ could only have been Nawaf Obaid, one of the few ‘strategic analysts’, who talks regularly to the western press in Saudi Arabia.

Indeed, Western journalists who have to report on Saudi matters are very grateful for the garrulous Nawaf, who set himself up as a one-man strategic analyst after doing his BA at the War Studies Department at Kings College London and has now obtained a Fellowship at Harvard.

The Telegraph’s Con Coughlin has reportedly lauded him as one of the best sources in the Middle East and the following day he too was penning an article along remarkably similar lines to the one from the BBC, where again he referred to  “one senior Saudi source”, whom he said commented:

“It is not unusual for Saudi Arabia to make donations like this. It happens all the time to help moderate Muslim governments to remain in power so that they can provide regional security tackle the extremist threat.”


Really?

Coughlin’s single sourced claim contrasted markedly with feedback obtained by papers with journalists on the ground, like the Wall Street Journal, which reported that Saudi officials had denied any knowledge of such an individual payment, which was described as “unprecedented”.

Recently concluded? Nawaf”s story was snatched upon by the Telegraph to attack its political enemies in the UK

Nevertheless, to have two mainstream publications swallow the story hook line and sinker that King Abdullah had kindly given Najib a secret personal US$681 million dollar donation through an off-shore BVI account, in order that he could illegally rig an election, was manna to UMNO spinners and the BBC ‘corroboration’ in particular appeared in numerous articles internationally.

Nawaf’s record as a paid spinner for Najib 

Sarawak Report has, of course, already exposed Nawaf Obaid as one of numerous agents hired by the Prime Minister’s Office over recent years to ‘spin’ against Najib’s political enemies in the western media.

The line up – Jho Low left, Prince Turki 2nd left and Tarek Obaid 2nd right – on the yacht they hired and pretended belonged to the Sauid Prince!

Last month we documented in detailhow the supposedly objective insider, was getting monster kick-backs behind the scenes for doing PR favours via his ‘briefings’ of foreign journalists and through “Op Eds” in newspapers, which he arrogantly claimed to be a master writer of, compared to Najib’s official media teams.

We have evidence of payments of over US$1.7 million to Nawaf, in what appear to have been a wider pattern of transfers from his brother Tarek Obaid, in return for his involvement in a campaign to defame the opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim in the media and in US government circles after 2010.

Please send my brother a million dollars out of that money I got from 1MDB

For the money Nawaf, who did indeed hold a Saudi official post at that time, was also used to access favours for Najib, who was attempting to create an impression of a close personal relationship with the Saudi King.

Yet, when Najib together with Jho Low attempted to engage Nawaf in a plan to organise a visit by King Abdullah to Malaysia and to get the Arab Royal to lend him US$10 billion in 2011 at low interest rates, Nawaf sneeringly dismissed them as fantasists “on drugs”.

“No No N, just ask for 1 Trillion dollars in this case and save everyone the hasstle! Someone is taking some sever and I mean sever DRUGS!” (sic) [Nawaf to brother Tarek]


Even so, five years later the same characters are trying to convince the world that King Abdullah did after all ‘donate’ Najib a 2 billion ringgit bung, on a basis of a couple of short audiences that were achieved in Riyadh.

The Prince Turki connection and his US$77 million kick-back

However, this is not the only respect in which Nawaf Obaid is a deeply compromised source upon which to rely on matters relating to Najib and 1MDB.

Because Nawaf’s brother is none other than the same Tarek Obaid, who was the Director of PetroSaudi, the company which is now being investigated by the Swiss and Singapore authorities, along with the FBI and Serious Fraud Office, for acting as a front to siphon hundreds of millions from Malaysia’s 1MDB development fund.

The money that was paid to Nawaf by Tarek can in fact be traced to the tens of millions of dollars Tarek netted in kickbacks from Najib’s ‘official advisor’ Jho Low, originally looted from 1MDB.

The definitive diagram – pulled together from the documents by The Edge

It was for this reason that Sarawak Report told the BBC that any claim emanating from the single source of Nawaf Obaid should be treated with extreme caution.

A particular give away in the single source-based reportage was the hint that Prince Turki bin Abdullah, the now deceased King’s 7th son, was somehow involved in this generous payment to Najib.  Because Turki also is deeply compromised by the whole affair, in that he is the other 50% Shareholder of PetroSaudi and, like Tarek, he was handsomely rewarded with enormous kickbacks out of money extracted from 1MDB.

The money trail (above) obtained from data from PetroSaudi’s own emails (thanks to the now jailed whistleblower Xavier Justo) shows that the Prince, who was by no means personally wealthy as has been implied, received at least US$77 million from the deal.

Here are the confirmations sent by JP Morgan Swiss to PetroSaudi after they handled the payments:

Further payments brought the total to US$77 million from Tarek’s JP Morgan account which received hundreds of millions from Good Star and 1MDB

Payment notice to Tarek Obaid by JP Morgan

Therefore, the idea put forward by the BBC article that Prince Turki, who is described as having “extensive business interests in Malaysia”, was partially the ‘donor’ of Najib’s windfall is laughable.

Far from donating, Turki has looted money from Malaysia!

It has made the Prince vulnerable to pressure, as the people around Najib have sought desperately to find a convincing Arab to pose as the donor. The story going round KL is that it was indeed Prince Turki, who was introduced to the Deputy Prime Minister and to MACC officials as the source of the money.

On the basis of these private assurances, backed by no published evidence whatsoever, both parties have now publicly announced that they have ‘met the donor’ and are ‘satisfied’.

Unsurprisingly, the Prince is said to be adamantly resisting any more public show on the matter.  Nor has any proof been obtained that the money came from him, beyond his Royal word, which we have shown was already bought for US$77 million.

Sarawak’s ‘Islamic extremism’ problem?

It is perhaps not surprising therefore that the single-sourced information obtained by the BBC and Telegraph appears to be full of uniformed nonsense to those who know something about Malaysia.

For example, the statement by the BBC that (according to their ‘source’) most of the money allegedly provided by the Saudi King to target incipient terrorist extremism was spent on projects to prevent extremism in Sarawak, is laughable.

“The purpose of the donation was simple, said the Saudi source – it was to help Mr Najib and his coalition win the election, employing a strategic communications team with international experience, focusing on the province of Sarawak, and funding social programmes through party campaigning.

But why should the Saudis care about an election in a non-Arab country more than 6,000 km (3,700 miles) away? The answer, the source said, lay in their concerns over the rising power of the Muslim Brotherhood, which they consider a terrorist organisation.” [BBC, “Saudi gift to Malaysia PM Najib Razak ‘for election campaign’]


As everyone who knows knows, Sarawak is predominantly Christian and the Muslim rulers installed by KL protect their base by condemning bigotry.

Yes, much of the money was spent on vote-buying is Sarawak, according to all reports, but the bribes in Sarawak were to secure BN’s so-called “safe deposits” in the isolated rural seats in these backward states, in order to shore up their loss of support in West Malaysia and in the urban areas.

It had nothing to do with Islam, but it provoked the appropriate Pavlovian response in certain single-minded, but under-informed western journalists. Well done Nawaf?

Fingerprints

Yet the Muslim Brotherhood label carries clear fingerprints.  It is the accusation that Najib’s PR people have used for years to tarnish the now jailed opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s image amongst liberal allies in the West.

It is also the accusation that Sarawak Report has provided emails to show that Nawaf Obaid was commissioned to spin on behalf of Najib.  It is therefore not at all surprising that he appears to have dragged it up again to try and explain the so-called donation.

On a previous occasion, as Sarawak Report has documented, Nawaf was less lucky in convincing responsible journalists, who had bothered to seek corroboration for his Muslim Brotherhood line against Anwar.

The BBC’s Jeremy Bowen told him in a email in December 2010:

“the most common response I am getting is from people who suggest this is another attempt to damage Anwar Ibrahim’s reputation”.


After which the frustrated spinner emailed his brother to complain “how difficult it has been to get a serious news organisation to run with this subject”

From:

nawafobaid@aol.com<nawafobaid@aol.com>

Date:

23/12/2010 11:57

To:

Tarek.Obaid@Petrosaudi.com

Show email

TO :-

You should at some point also show this to your “accidental” friend to show him

how difficult it has been to get serious news organization to run with this subject.

Only do this when the stories start coming out!

NO

—–Original Message—–
From: Jeremy Bowen <jeremy.bowen@bbc.co.uk>
To: nawafobaid@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 2:51 pm
Subject: Re: Update

Nawaf

Sorry for delayed reply.

Unfortunately I have been rather ill, not working now for almost a month (though I did do an obituary for my colleague Brian Hanrahan).

Anyway I’m now much better, and have found your email. My chasing of your dossier was on hold while I was on my sickbed.

As yet, the most common response I am getting is from people who suggest this is another attempt to damage Anwar Ibrahim’s reputation.

I am also struck by the fact that Saleh Kamel appears to be as much the subject of the dossier as Anwar Ibrahim.

Anyway I continue to try to corroborate but thus far don’t have anything I can take to air.

Even if I did, I would not be able to get it on until the New Year. Our news programmes shrink during the holiday period and won’t be back to normal until the first week of January.

Hope you escaped our snow.

Best wishes to you and your family

Jeremy

Fromnawafobaid@aol.com [mailto:nawafobaid@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 09:26 AM
To: Jeremy Bowen
Subject: Update

Jeremy :-

Any updates? I have not heard back at all from you and wondering

what happened? Please let me know cause this is a priority for us

especially with the backdrop of the cables leaks and the sensitivity

of the assessment?

Thanks,

NAWAF

Never mind, last week Nawaf scored big time with the Daily Telegraph’s Con Coughlin, who even developed the theme in order to condemn the foreign policy of the British Labour Party, whom his newspaper politically opposes:

‘..the really intriguing fact to emerge from the year-long investigation, has been the revelation that the accusations actually related to a secret payment made by Saudi Arabia to help Mr Najib win the 2013 election campaign.

Ever since the emergence of Islamic State (Isil) in Syria and Iraq, Left-wing critics such as Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn have consistently accused the Saudis of funding Isil and other Islamist extremist groups.

But what the Najib investigation demonstrates is that the opposite is the case, and that, rather than funding extremists, the Saudi government has been quietly supporting moderate Muslim leaders around the world as part of their attempts to combat the global threat posed by Islamist-inspired extremism.” [Telegraph “Saudi Arabia funds moderate Muslims, not Isil. Extremism is on the rise in South East Asia. Of course the Saudis want to stop that”.]


This is what the world of media spinners would describe as a bullseye for Nawaf and one can only imagine the invoice he might have subsequently put into the Malaysian PM’s Office.  Media Coordinator Paul Stadlen will have been happy to pay, it seems, as he re-parcelled the material around the client media.

Najib warrior Rajah Petra Kamaruddin was soon trumpeting the Telegraph analysis

However, when Sarawak Report attempted to call Mr Coughlin to put him right about this latest canard, he sadly slammed down the phone before we had a chance to finish introducing ourselves.

Khamis, 4 Februari 2016

What Singapore Knows About 1MDB's Money Trail - Answer: Enough To Really Close The Case

To Really Close The Case

3 FEB 2016

Now that Singapore has signalledthat it is working with the Swiss and US regulators to investigate the suspicious money transfers related to 1MDB, it is worth recalling what their Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) do already know.

1MDB PetroSaudi’s missing money

Zeti Akhtar Aziz, Governor of BNM has officially demanded 1MDB repatriate US$1.83 bn misappropriated from the PetroSaudi JB

With regard to the first suspicious IMDB transactions in 2009/10, relating to its joint venture with the company PetroSaudi, the three regulatory regimes by now have an almost comprehensive knowledge of what happened to the bulk of the US$1.83 billion, which the Bank of Malaysia (BNM) has formally complained was misappropriated under false pretences (a charge the Prime Minister and his Attorney General have chosen to ignore against 1MDB).

After all, these payments were transferred in US dollars, through the US clearing system, into Swiss banks, meaning they are open to scrutiny by both Swiss and US investigators.

The banks concerned were JP Morgan Swiss, which managed the money that went to 1MDB PetroSaudi’s supposed joint venture operations and RBS Coutts Zurich, which received the original US$700 million that was illegally siphonedout of the joint venture in 2009, plus a second payment of US$330 million in 2011, according to Malaysianinvestigation papers obtained by Sarawak Report last year.

Further evidence obtained from the PetroSaudi database, leaked by jailedwhistleblower Xavier Justo, shows that of the remaining US$800 million sent to the 1MDB PetroSaudi joint venture account, JP Morgan transferred no less than US$386 million into PetroSaudi Director Tarek Obaid’s own private account, which he handily kept at the same bank.

The definitive diagram – pulled together from the documents by The Edge

US$260 million of that went towards buying out the Jho Low/Taib owned UBG group and the rest went on Tarek’s own expenses.

Only US$400 million of the total sum went into PetroSaudi’s formal operations.  These were managed through accounts mainly handled again by the same branch of JP Morgan, which continued to  transfer vast sums between the business accounts of the sovereign joint venture fund and PetroSaudi and the private accounts of its Directors.

As, Sarawak Report has already detailed, the UK Director Patrick Mahony also opened an account with JP Morgan and received US$33 million of 1MDB’s money via the Tarek Obaid account.

JP Morgan Swiss held numerous public and private accounts for PetroSaudi and its Directors

In summary it means that of the US$1.83 billion taken from 1MDB only US$400 million went into the intended place, which was PetroSaudi’s operations, of which 1MDB nevertheless claimed only a 40% share under the joint venture.

This was the share that it later claimed to have sold for a staggering US$2.3 billion just a year later in 2012 (of which more later).

The Swiss and US authorities will have been able to share this now public information with Singapore and more.

Where did the money go next? Singapore’s linchpin bank manager at BSI Bank

1MDB Board Minutes revealed to the Public Accounts Committee and to the Auditor General (and published by Sarawak Report) have made clear that the Board was horrified to discover back in 2009 how the company’s management under CEO Shahrol Halmi had allowed this money to be extracted in an operation that had been entirely directed by Najib’s appointed advisor at 1MDB, the young businessman Jho Low.

The Chairman of the Board and another member resigned, having unsuccessfully demanded that the money be returned.

Singapore investigators are very well placed to know what happened to the bulk of the missing joint venture money next, thanks to their enquiries into the Singapore branch of BSI Bank, from which a local linchpin for Jho Low’s activities, Yak Yew Chee, has been suspended as a manager and where numerous bank accounts have been frozen.

BSI Singapore – another Swiss private bank in the money trail

They have ascertained (as Sarawak Report reported last year) that no less than US$530 million of the money siphoned out of 1MDB into the RBS Coutts Good Star Limited account 2009-11 was later transferred into a BSI Singapore account belonging to Jho Low during 2011-13 under the name of a company ADKMIC (Abu Dhabi Kuwait Malaysia Investment Company), which he beneficially owned.

The Singapore authorities notified the Malaysian investigators into 1MDB of this fact in March, as reported by Sarawak Report.

Transfers of 1MDB’s cash from Good Star’s RBS Coutts account to Jho Low’s BSI account.

The Singapore authorities have also recorded that in February 2014 Jho Low cleaned out this account and closed it.  They will know where that half billion was sent next, because the record will be with the BSI bank branch and, since it was doubtless transferred in dollars, so will the Americans.

Hong Kong connection – time for action?

Sarawak Report has good reason to believe that much of the money moved out of Singapore by Low was placed in Hong Kong.  It is futher understood that the Hong Kong authorities have also put a freeze on multi-billion dollar accounts which trace back to money siphoned from 1MDB.

The people of Malaysia will therefore be waiting to see if the Hong Kong authorities support other international regulators in coming out to openly confirm that they too are applying due enforcement measures to ensure the integrity of their finance centre?

Brazen Lie

Returning to the PetroSaudi missing money and the BSI bank connection, Singapore has further key pieces of the jigsaw puzzle right there at their finger tips, of course.

The Minister of Finance, Najib Razak, made an astonishing claim in 2012 that 1MDB had obtained a fantastic profit out of the PetroSaudi joint venture and had sold out its ‘interest’ to an anonymous entity for USD$2.3 billion (see above).

Not bad for a mere 40% share of an investment of US$400 million a few months earlier!

This windfall, Najib explained, was being invested in an anonymous fund in the Cayman Islands.  Unfortunately, many of Malaysia’s more financially literate politicians proved hard to convince over this, particularly as no evidence was brought forward to substantiate the claims.

The opaque deal was subjected to relentless probing by opposition politicians and eventually it came out that the fund concerned was a shady venture, which was subsequently investigated anddismantled by the Australianregulators. Time to move the ‘investment’, which was suddenly declared to have been “redeemed” and taken under a subsidiary of 1MDB called Brazen Sky Limited.

It was announced by the Ministry of Finance in 2014, therefore, that Brazen Sky had opened an account at none other than very same the Singapore branch of BSI Bank managed by Mr Yak.

This account was declared by the Ministry of Finance and 1MDB in early 2015 to contain US$1.103 billion dollars in cash, the rest having been allegedly spent on 1MDB’s various ‘obligations’, which supposedly included buying out an ‘option’ obtained by the Abu Dhabi Aabar fund on 1MDB’s later power purchase deals (more on that later).

But, as Sarawak Report has alreadyreported, the Singapore authorities told the Malaysian investigators in March that in fact there was no actual cash in this account, as had been adamantly claimed by 1MDB’s CEO Arul Kanda.

The Brazen Sky account was in fact a Brazen Lie account, according to anofficial letter from the Singapore Commercial Affairs Department to the Bank of Malaysia, obtained by Sarawak Report:

“BSI Bank received a facsimile of the BSI bank statement of account dated 30th Nov 2014 of Brazen Sky Limited, from Mr Arul Kanda, the CEO of 1MDB.  We have received information that the bank statement does not represent the coreect position of the assets nor liabilities of the account and that the bank did not issue such a document”, the letter read.


After our expose Arul Kanda admitted there was no cash and clarified there were only undefined “units” in the account.

This made perfect sense to those who had wondered how 1MDB could have received US$2.3 billion dollars for an investment from which all the money had long since gone and why if they had received the money 1MDB had come up with so many conflicting stories as to why they did not employ the money to help bail it out of its increasing debts?

Aabar and the US$681 million in the PM’s account

The emergence of Mr Yak, due in court in Singapore on Friday, also neatly pulls together yet further key pieces of the 1MDB missing money jigsaw.  This is because it has been revealed that he was not only the relationship manager for Jho Low (yesterday we published emailsshowing how he transferred millions to purchase diamonds for Rosmah Mansor on behalf of Low) and Brazen Sky.

He was also the manager for SRC International and Aabar Investment PJS Limited, which are all major channels for money that has gone missing from Malaysia’s public coffers and turn out to have had accounts at the very same Singapore Bank!

In the case of Aabar, 1MDB had audited that it had paid US$850 million to the Abu Dhabi fund, which for some reason ‘co-guaranteed’ a USD3.5 billion bond issue to fund 1MDB’s power purchase programme in 2012. The US$850 million was to satisfy an option offered to Aabar in return, it was explained.

Except the Wall Street Journal haspointed out that Aabar Investments PJS Limited (BVI), which is the company that actually received this payment, is not in fact a subsidiary of Aabar or linked in any way to the Abu Dhabi fund, despite the confusingly similar name!

Since we have now learnt that Mr Yak was the Singapore manager for that company account, he will be very easily in a position to tell the authorities exactly who owns this off-shore concern and who therefore actually received that missing US$850 million from 1MDB!

SRC International

Likewise, it has been harder than drawing dragons’ teeth to get a satisfactory answer out of the Malaysian Minister of Finance (the self-same Najib) as to what has happened to the bulk of the RM4 billion that he allowed the company SRC International to borrow from the KWAP public pension fund.

Was Nik Faisal Yak’s client?

SRC International used to be a subsidiary of 1MDB, of which Najib is the sole shareholder and signatory, but after questions were asked about the failure to provide timely financial records it was moved directly under the Ministry of Finance, also controlled by Najib.

Throughout its changing ownership, SRC has been managed by Nik Faisal Arif Kamil, a close associate of Jho Low, who was also the Investment Manager of 1MDB and simultaneously the Chief Investment Officer at UBG Bank at the very same time that 1MDB was buying out UBG.

Nik Kamil also happened to have a job acting as a proxy (with power of attorney) over the bank accounts belonging to the Prime Minister, which received payments from SRC and he was the director of the company Gandingan Mentari, through which money was transferred from SRC to the PM’s private accounts.

He is now hiding in Indonesia.

Malaysia now knows of course, amidst considerable scandal, that at least RM55 million was transferred into the Prime Minister’s private accounts from SRC – money which came from the public pension fund KWAP.  However, the PM last week has said he didn’t realise the money had come from there and thought it had come in from a generous donor and the Attorney General he appointed has accepted this excuse and decided not to prosecute him – calling him “cleared”.

However, that still leaves an awful lot more missing from SRC which remains unaccounted for.

Sarawak Report has already analysed how a statement by the Prime Minister that the bulk of the borrowed money had been invested in a Mongolian Coal venture does not add up with official company figures, which demonstrate at most that the investment in Gobi Coal can only be worth around RM180 million, leaving most of the RM4 billion still unaccounted for.

The good news is that now that we know that Mr Yak was also the manager for an SRC account in Singapore, perhaps Malaysians can expect to learn more from the Singapore enquiries into this matter as well!

Tanore Finance Corporation

Finally, Singapore is also in a position to tell the world everything it needs to know about that whopping US$681 million “donation” received by the Prime Minister from an anonymous source, which is now being described as a Saudi Royal – more specifically the dead King Abdullah, as touted by media spinners.

Swiss Falcon Bank CEO Eduardo Leeman

This is because the money was paid into Najib’s KL account via the Aabar owned Swiss Falcon Bank’s Singapore branch.

The Chairman of the Bank Mohamed Al Husseiny was also the CEO of Aabar, which had been involved in raising massive bond deals with 1MDB.

Al Husseiny and his boss the Aabar Chairman Khadem Al Qubaisi have now both been sacked by the Abu Dhabi sovereign fund, in a hugely significant crackdown by the Emirate state against the fund’s blatant corruption and mismanagement.  Malaysians are therefore waiting to see, as with Hong Kong and Australia, whether Abu Dhabi will open up about some of the goings on at Aabar regarding 1MDB as they start trying to clean up the mess at this IPIC subsidiary.

Meanwhile, the Swiss CEO of Falcon, Eduardo Leeman, can hardly have been unaware of such an enormous series of transactions in their small Singapore branch. He and the local managers of Falcon Bank in Singapore had a duty to know who was the beneficial owner of the Tanore Finance Corporation (BVI) account held at their bank.

It was from here that the two transfers totalling US$681 million were made to Najib in 2013, so the owner ought to provide a clear indication as to the provenance of the money.

So Singapore can tell us, was it the Saudi King Abdullah, hiding through an off-shore entity or was it perhaps Jho Low, having received the money out of the 1MDB Aabar connected bond for US$3 billion which had just been raised in a mad hurry during the previous week by Goldman Sachs on behalf of Najib Razak?

The Goldman Sachs connection

Of course, the US regulators will be able to ask Goldman Sachs about where the 1MDB bond money was sent once they raised it on behalf of Najib. Altogether three 1MDB bond issues linked to guarantees from Aabar raised US$6.5 billion in 2012-13. So, did the money go to regular 1MDB accounts or to dodgy off-shore companies with accounts in places like Singapore?

Leave of absence Goldman’s top guy in Singapore Tim Leissner

The Singapore authorities will also be able to make queries of Goldman Sachs on this matter, because these bond deals were handled by the Singapore head at the bank, Tim Leissner, who boasted a personal friendship with Najib and Rosmah.

Coincidentally, Leissner has just taken an unexpected leave of absence from his Singapore based job and has returned to the United States. However all these regulatory authorities are well placed to determine whether the Tanore Finance Corporation accounts had anything to do with 1MDB and Jho Low.

Money ‘returned to donor’

Singapore is also perfectly placed to shed light on perhaps the most baffling stage of this twisted tale of missing billions.  Last year Sarawak Report had revealed that Najib had in fact, shortly after the 2013 election, closed down his multi-billion election buying KL account and sent the money back to Singapore.

We reported he had sent USD$650 million back out of the account to BSI.  We also reported that, over and above the famous RM2.6 billion from Tanore Finance Corporation, there had been at least two more multi-million dollar payments into Najib’s KL account at AmBank between 2011 and 2013, meaning that it had topped a billion dollars during the election period.  We reported that this was why Najib had so much remaining to send back out of the country after pouring money into that campaign.

King Abdullah – not in a position to disprove Najib’s claim – as he has died

It took over six months before Najib last week conceded that indeed we were correct and that money had been sent back – the Attorney General gave a figure of US$620 million, which he claimed was sent back to the original anonymous donor of all that money!

However, this new excuse has totally ignored our original information that other payments had also been made into Najib’s account.

To the contrary AG Apandi and Najib’s lawyers have stuck to the line that Najib “returned” all but US$61 million dollars out of an original US$681 to the alleged “Saudi royal donor”, on the basis that this was all he used in swaying the election his way.

Why didn’t he tell everyone that in the first place?

Was he waiting to see if the newspapers had any documentary evidence to prove there was more money in the AmBank account before he decided to ignore the further payments we have identified?  In which case woe betide if more information comes out from the very many investigations into the matter!

Of course, the Singapore authorities can easily obtain the exact figures, since the money went through there.  They can also ascertain if the money was indeed returned in a westerly direction towards a Saudi Royal figure or in an easterly direction towards a 1MDB-related figure, like Jho Low for example, in Hong Kong.

Australian connection

It is at this point that Malaysians are starting to wonder, as with Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi, if the Australians are going to do their duty and step up to the plate alongside the US, Swiss and Singapore authorities?

Because ANZ Bank are the major shareholders of Malaysia’s AmBank and they too must know who were the beneficial parties in the money transfers into Najib’s KL account.

AmBank’s chief executive in KL at the time of these monster transfers into Najib’s account was an Australian banker on secondment from ANZ.  Like Goldman’s Mr Leissner this executive also stepped down earlier than expected last year, however the Australian regulators by now ought to have examined the case and they ought to also know the reason why AmBank has recently paid an enormous multi-million dollar fine for unspecified matters to the Malaysian Central Bank.

In particular, we ask, what steps were taken by the majority Australian owned AmBank to identify the ‘fake sheikh’ who guaranteed all four of the major payments made into Najib Razak’s account 2011-13, as reported by Sarawak Report, which totalled over a billion according to our reliable sources of information?

After all, it was the same sheikh, “His Highness Saud Abdulaziz Majid al-Saud”, who wrote to authorise the payment of US$170 million to Najib from a BVI company namedBlackstone Asia Real Estate Partners (BVI) in 2011, as it was who later guaranteed the more famous ‘donation’ of US$681 million from Tanore Finance Corporation (BVI) later in 2013.

Since there is evidence that the beneficial owner of Blackstone Asia Real Estate Partners is 1MDB’s Jho Low, this merits further investigation by the Australian regulators of AmBank, as well as the regulators in Singapore.

To summarise

In summary, the Singapore regulators are in a prime position to identify if the latest explanation coming out of KL, after months of twists and turns, denials and new stories, is true, which is that a Saudi King gave Najib billions of ringgit to help win the 2013 election (and defeat PAS) nearly all of which Najib then sent back.

Or is the far simpler and more logical picture that has started to emerge, in fact the truth, which is that this was all money systematically stolen from 1MDB and KWAP?

What appears plain from the facts, which all piece very nicely together at this stage, is that people with influence over 1MDB, SRC, Aabar and PetroSaudi conspired to remove money from the Malaysian development fund and KWAP pension fund, very much in the way succinctly described last week in the statement of the Swiss Attorney General.

First, these systematic fraudsters pretended to be investing in PetroSaudi, then they pretended to be engaged in raising money and investing with Aabar.  In fact, it is plain to see that very little was invested, meanwhile some RM25 billion (around US$8 billion) has gone missing and unaccounted for from these Malaysian public funds.

If so, did some of that missing money find its way into Najib’s massive election war chest and later was a lot of it returned back out of the country, into the web of off-shore companies and Swiss and Singapore bank accounts, once that election was over?

Also, was some of the rest of the money used to pay off key players who allowed their organisations (namely PetroSaudi and Aabar) to be used as fronts – for example the half billion dollars that Sarawak Reportrecently exposed as being paid to the sacked Aabar Chairman Khadem Al Qubaisi?

Jho Low –

Finally, what about all that record money, which has been has been conspicuously lavished by 1MDB’s youthful bigwigs like Jho Low, apparently celebrating their success in looting one of the largest sums of money to have ever been stolen from anywhere?

Indeed, it was the partying and eye-popping expenditures by Jho Low, Khadem al Qubaisi and their champagne-quaffing, blond bimbo-loving friends that first alerted Sarawak Report to the likely destination of 1MDB’s missing billions.

We just followed the money and we have spoken out… and no one has sued us yet!